How toppers approached this question
Social transformation programs such as "beti bachao and beti padhao" believes in using advice, counseling, and persuasion but sometimes a little force is also necessary for getting the desired response. Do you think it is a good idea to mix little force with persuasion by public administrators while implementing social schemes of transformation? Explain with relevant examples. (Answer in 150 words) 10 Marks
How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.
The topper method
Explain
The spine toppers built
Open
- Define the key term first
- Context-hook opening
Build
- Numbered enumeration
- Directive-mirroring headers
- Mechanism as arrow-chain
Close
- Verdict conclusion
- Forward-looking close
Moves they converged on
- Numbered enumeration65% of answers
Enumerate points as a numbered list.
- Example as evidence58% of answers
Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.
- Verdict conclusion45% of answers
End with a clear verdict.
- Thinker / quote as authority42% of answers
Invoke a thinker or quote as authority.
- Define the key term first40% of answers
Open by defining the central term.
Evidence toppers carried (per answer)
Concepts ~2Current events ~1Examples ~1People ~1Statutes ~1Thinkers ~1Other anchors ~1
GS4 · Explain: derived from 121 real past-paper answers: counts, not copied prose
Write your own answer to this question
Mark my answer freeMethod is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.