How toppers approached this question
In the context of the above-stated information, address the following: (a) What are the ethical issues in the given case study? (b) How can the vision of economic development of a nation be achieved without adversely affecting the sustainability of oceans? (Answer in 250 words)
How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.
The topper method
The spine toppers built
Open
- Context-hook opening
- Define the key term first
Build
- Segmented multi-part answer
- Numbered enumeration
- Directive-mirroring headers
Close
- Verdict conclusion
- Forward-looking close
Moves they converged on
- Segmented multi-part answer70% of answers
Answer each part in its own segment.
- Stakeholder map67% of answers
Map every affected stakeholder.
- Dilemma as value conflict65% of answers
Frame the dilemma as a clash of values.
- Numbered enumeration59% of answers
Enumerate points as a numbered list.
- Directive-mirroring headers52% of answers
Headers that mirror the question's directive.
Evidence toppers carried (per answer)
Case anatomy · Environmental ethics
- Ethical issues95% of toppers
- Chosen option92% of toppers
- Justification91% of toppers
- Values in conflict72% of toppers
- Stakeholders70% of toppers
- Options67% of toppers
Write your own answer to this question
Mark my answer freeMethod is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.