AspirantFlowGet your answer marked
Topper approaches · GS4

How toppers approached this question

In the context of the above-stated information, address the following: (a) What are the ethical issues in the given case study? (b) How can the vision of economic development of a nation be achieved without adversely affecting the sustainability of oceans? (Answer in 250 words)

How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.

workspace_premium

The topper method

Case study

The spine toppers built

  1. Open

    • Context-hook opening
    • Define the key term first
  2. Build

    • Segmented multi-part answer
    • Numbered enumeration
    • Directive-mirroring headers
  3. Close

    • Verdict conclusion
    • Forward-looking close

constructionMoves they converged on

  • Segmented multi-part answer70% of answers

    Answer each part in its own segment.

  • Stakeholder map67% of answers

    Map every affected stakeholder.

  • Dilemma as value conflict65% of answers

    Frame the dilemma as a clash of values.

  • Numbered enumeration59% of answers

    Enumerate points as a numbered list.

  • Directive-mirroring headers52% of answers

    Headers that mirror the question's directive.

  • Options with merits / demerits50% of answers

    List options with their merits and demerits.

  • Chosen action + escalation43% of answers

    State your action and how you would escalate it.

  • Problems then remedies43% of answers

    Pair each problem with a remedy.

stairsEvidence toppers carried (per answer)

Concepts ~2Current events ~1Thinkers ~1Principles ~1Statutes ~1Examples ~1Judgments ~1Other anchors ~1

account_treeCase anatomy · Environmental ethics

  • Ethical issues95% of toppers
  • Chosen option92% of toppers
  • Justification91% of toppers
  • Values in conflict72% of toppers
  • Stakeholders70% of toppers
  • Options67% of toppers
databaseGS4 · Case study: derived from 199 real past-paper answers: counts, not copied prose

Write your own answer to this question

Get it read and marked against the mains rubric, then see which of these moves you landed. No sign-up is needed.

boltMark my answer free

Method is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.