How toppers approached this question
"Genome editing holds immense potential for crop improvement, but it also raises ethical and safety concerns". How far do the new guidelines for the safety assessment of genome-edited plants in India, ensure the safety of genetically modified crops?
How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.
The topper method
Discuss
The spine toppers built
Open
- Context-hook opening
- Define the key term first
Build
- Numbered enumeration
- Directive-mirroring headers
- Problems then remedies
Close
- Verdict conclusion
- Forward-looking close
Moves they converged on
- Numbered enumeration79% of answers
Enumerate points as a numbered list.
- Data as argument62% of answers
Use a figure to carry the argument, not decorate it.
- Example as evidence60% of answers
Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.
- Directive-mirroring headers56% of answers
Headers that mirror the question's directive.
- Context-hook opening47% of answers
Open with a hook that frames the issue.
Evidence toppers carried (per answer)
Data points ~2Concepts ~2Other anchors ~1Statutes ~1Current events ~1Examples ~1Institutions ~1People ~1
GS3 · Discuss: derived from 135 real past-paper answers: counts, not copied prose
Write your own answer to this question
Mark my answer freeMethod is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.