How toppers approached this question

Examine various issues related to utilization of public resources. Also discuss the role of ethics in resolving these issues.

How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.

The topper method

Examine

The spine toppers built

Open
- Define the key term first
- Context-hook opening
Build
- Numbered enumeration
- Both sides before the verdict
- Directive-mirroring headers
Close
- Verdict conclusion
- Forward-looking close

Moves they converged on

Numbered enumeration62% of answers
Enumerate points as a numbered list.
Example as evidence54% of answers
Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.
Verdict conclusion52% of answers
End with a clear verdict.
Define the key term first48% of answers
Open by defining the central term.
Both sides before the verdict38% of answers
Weigh both sides before taking a stand.
Directive-mirroring headers37% of answers
Headers that mirror the question's directive.
Context-hook opening35% of answers
Open with a hook that frames the issue.
Multi-dimensional buckets34% of answers
Sort points into clear dimensions (social, economic…).

Evidence toppers carried (per answer)

Current events ~1Thinkers ~1Examples ~1Sections / code provisions ~1Statutes ~1Concepts ~1Data points ~1Other anchors ~1

GS4 · Examine: derived from 82 real past-paper answers: counts, not copied prose

Write your own answer to this question

Get it read and marked against the mains rubric, then see which of these moves you landed. No sign-up is needed.

Mark my answer free

Method is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.