How toppers approached this question

Analyze the socio-cultural factors contributing to the high attrition rate among women in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) careers in India. Suggest measures to improve their retention in STEM.

How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.

The topper method

Analyse

The spine toppers built

Open
- Context-hook opening
- Define the key term first
Build
- Numbered enumeration
- Multi-dimensional buckets
- Problems then remedies
Close
- Verdict conclusion
- Forward-looking close

Moves they converged on

Numbered enumeration74% of answers
Enumerate points as a numbered list.
Example as evidence70% of answers
Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.
Multi-dimensional buckets61% of answers
Sort points into clear dimensions (social, economic…).
Context-hook opening59% of answers
Open with a hook that frames the issue.
Verdict conclusion59% of answers
End with a clear verdict.
Problems then remedies43% of answers
Pair each problem with a remedy.
Directive-mirroring headers41% of answers
Headers that mirror the question's directive.
Data as argument35% of answers
Use a figure to carry the argument, not decorate it.

Evidence toppers carried (per answer)

Examples ~2Concepts ~2Data points ~1Other anchors ~1Current events ~1Institutions ~1People ~1

GS1 · Analyse: derived from 46 real past-paper answers: counts, not copied prose

Write your own answer to this question

Get it read and marked against the mains rubric, then see which of these moves you landed. No sign-up is needed.

Mark my answer free

Method is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.