(a) What are the issues involved in the above case? (b) With a limited budget at your disposal, you decide to allocate funds to tackle witchcraft-related superstitions. How would you justify your decision to the community and stakeholders? (c) Given that witchcraft-related crimes were not initially reported by the BDOs, how would you address this lack of communication and ensure better reporting and transparency moving forward? (Answer in 250 words) 20 marks

The spine toppers built

1. Open

   • Define the key term first
   • Context-hook opening

2. Build

   • Numbered enumeration
   • Directive-mirroring headers
   • Both sides before the verdict

3. Close

   • Verdict conclusion
   • Forward-looking close

constructionMoves they converged on

• Numbered enumeration65% of answers

  Enumerate points as a numbered list.

• Define the key term first63% of answers

  Open by defining the central term.

• Example as evidence57% of answers

  Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.

• Verdict conclusion55% of answers

  End with a clear verdict.

• Directive-mirroring headers37% of answers

  Headers that mirror the question's directive.

• Thinker / quote as authority28% of answers

  Invoke a thinker or quote as authority.

• Both sides before the verdict28% of answers

  Weigh both sides before taking a stand.

• Multi-dimensional buckets28% of answers

  Sort points into clear dimensions (social, economic…).

stairsEvidence toppers carried (per answer)

account_treeCase anatomy · Administrative & governance ethics

• Ethical issues96% of toppers
• Chosen option95% of toppers
• Justification93% of toppers
• Stakeholders72% of toppers
• Values in conflict68% of toppers
• Options68% of toppers