(a) What are the ethical issues and dilemmas in the above case? (b) What are the options available to you in the above case? (c) Considering the persistent nature of the RTI activist and the public's right to information, how should you navigate the tension between national security concerns and the principles of transparency and accountability? Explain

The spine toppers built

1. Open

   • Define the key term first
   • Context-hook opening

2. Build

   • Numbered enumeration
   • Directive-mirroring headers
   • Mechanism as arrow-chain

3. Close

   • Verdict conclusion
   • Forward-looking close

constructionMoves they converged on

• Numbered enumeration65% of answers

  Enumerate points as a numbered list.

• Example as evidence58% of answers

  Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.

• Verdict conclusion45% of answers

  End with a clear verdict.

• Thinker / quote as authority42% of answers

  Invoke a thinker or quote as authority.

• Define the key term first40% of answers

  Open by defining the central term.

• Directive-mirroring headers26% of answers

  Headers that mirror the question's directive.

• Static → current linkage19% of answers

  Link the static topic to a current event.

• Forward-looking close18% of answers

  Close on a forward-looking, aspirational note.

stairsEvidence toppers carried (per answer)

account_treeCase anatomy · Ethical dilemma

• Ethical issues94% of toppers
• Chosen option89% of toppers
• Justification89% of toppers
• Values in conflict83% of toppers
• Options78% of toppers
• Stakeholders75% of toppers