How toppers approached this question
3. (b) What do you understand by Probity in Governance? Examine whether the recent amendments to Prevention of Corruption Act and the proposed ones in Whistleblower Protection Act undermine it.
How toppers built answers of this type: the structure spine and the moves they converged on. Aggregated across real past-paper answers for this paper and directive, not this one question, so no question-specific evidence is shown. No answer text is reproduced.
The topper method
The spine toppers built
Open
- Define the key term first
- Context-hook opening
Build
- Numbered enumeration
- Both sides before the verdict
- Directive-mirroring headers
Close
- Verdict conclusion
- Forward-looking close
Moves they converged on
- Numbered enumeration62% of answers
Enumerate points as a numbered list.
- Example as evidence54% of answers
Tag a concrete example explicitly as evidence.
- Verdict conclusion52% of answers
End with a clear verdict.
- Define the key term first48% of answers
Open by defining the central term.
- Both sides before the verdict38% of answers
Weigh both sides before taking a stand.
Evidence toppers carried (per answer)
Case anatomy · Corruption
- Ethical issues96% of toppers
- Chosen option94% of toppers
- Justification89% of toppers
- Options70% of toppers
- Stakeholders64% of toppers
- Values in conflict62% of toppers
Write your own answer to this question
Mark my answer freeMethod is derived from real past-paper answers as anonymized aggregate signal. Construction moves and counts, never copied answer text.